Patentees Agitate For A New Hearing Date
Following
The Suspension Of JUSUN Strike
Content
(1.0) Introduction
(2.0) History Gallery Of CCNL`s Appeal In The Supreme Court
(3.0) The Need To Appreciate The BOD Members And Staff Of CCNL In The Course To Finalize The Appeal
(4.0) Conclusion
(1.0) Introduction
(1.1) The Patentees who have invested in the patented invention of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, RP:13522, have been agitating seriously for a new hearing date to entertain the outstanding motions with respect to patent right infringement appeal (SC./69/2011) against Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited ongoing in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
(1.2) It is on records that on 3rd of November, 2014, Honourable Justice Mahmud Mohammed (CJN) adjourned the hearing of all the outstanding motions to 19th of January, 2015 following an oral application made by CCNL`s Leading Legal Counsel, (Aiku Bamidele SAN) to effect the substitution of King Professor CJA Uwemedimo names in all the applications filed before the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
(1.3) Unfortunately, on 19th day of January, 2015, a day set aside to entertain those motions, clashed with the nationwide strike of the Nigerian Judiciary Workers.
(1.4) The nationwide industrial strike embarked upon by JUSUN was officially suspended in the Federal Courts only in Nigeria not excluding the Supreme Court of Nigeria on 26th of January, 2015.
(1.5) Sequel to the suspension of the industrial strike embarked upon by JUSUN on 26th of January, 2015, there have been agitations and outcries among patentees requesting for a new hearing date to finalize a fifteen-year-old case against Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited over an unauthorized use of the patented invention of King Professor Emeritus CJA Uwemedimo.
(2.0) History Gallery Of CCNL`s Appeal In The Supreme Court
(2.1) Honourable Justice Mahmud Mohammed (CJN), acknowledged that the Supreme Court of Nigeria has been over burdened with high volume of appeals in a Public Dialogue organized by Nigeria Bar Association, few weeks ago, when he said,
“The court registry is currently burdened with over 5,000 appeals, and the panels of justices are still hearing appeals filed in 2005”
(2.2) From the above statement of Honourable Justice Mahmud Mohammed (CJN), it is obvious that appeals filed 10 years ago (2005) in the Supreme Court of Nigeria have not been concluded by the Judges in view of the fact that the court has been over burdened with high volumes of appeals.
(2.3) Despite those outrageous numbers of pending appeals seriously begging for hearings before the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the Honourble Justices had fixed appeal of CCNL versus Mobil Oil (
eight times as stated below
(2.3.1) 10th of July, 2012: Mobil Oil totally failed to appear in the Supreme Court, and Justice Aloma (CJN) subsequently adjourned the appeal to 29th of January, 2013
(2.3.2) 29th of January, 2013: Supreme Court made an error to assign the appeal to Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs , who delivered ruling in the Federal court of Appeal between CCNL and Mobil Oil. Note, a judge cannot sit on his own appeal. Justice Aloma (CJN) apologized for the error, and she subsequently adjourned the appeal to 8th of April, 2013.
(2.3.3) 8th of April, 2013: Honourable Justice Mahmud Mohammed granted the Cross Appeal filed by Mobil Oil, and the Amended Brief Of Argument filed by CCNL.
(2.3.4) 30th of October, 2013: Justice Tanko Mohammed ruled in the Inner Chamber of the Supreme Court On Accelerated Hearing Motion filed by CCNL, and subsequently adjourned the appeal to 5th of May, 2014.
(2.3.5) 5th of May, 2014: Honourable Justice Walter Nkanu Onnoghen (JSC) dismissed the Appeal of CCNL on an alleged notice of withdrawal purportedly written by Tony Ukam (Former CCNL Lawyer) but filed by Pastor Monday (Ex-Staff of CCNL), and Honourable Justice Walter Nkanu Onnoghen (JSC) subsequently adjourned the Cross Appeal to 7th of October, 2014.
(2.3.6) 7th of October, 2014: Court was unable to sit on any motion because 7th of October, 2014 clashed with Muslim Festival, and subsequently the court re-fixed the appeal to 3rd of November, 2014.
(2.3.7) 3rd of November, 2014: The death of the King was communicated to the Court. In view of the fact that a dead person cannot sue or be sued, Honourable Justice Mahmud Mohammed (CJN) subsequently adjourned the appeal to 19th of January, 2015 to effect the substitution of names of the King.
(2.3.
19th of January, 2015: Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria were unable to entertain any motion because of JUSUN strike unfortunately clashed with 19th of January, 2015.
(3.0) The Need To Appreciate The BOD Members And Staff Of CCNL In The Course To Finalize The Appeal.
(3.1) It is on record that CCNL filed its Appeal in the Registry of the Supreme Court of Nigeria in the year 2011, and the Appeal in question had been fixed for hearing (
eight times in the history of the case.
(3.2) There are appeals filed in year 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 in the Registry of the Supreme Court of Nigeria that might have not been fixed for hearing up to (
eight times.
(3.3) Patentees of Comandclem Nigeria Limited should appreciate the concerted efforts of the entire Board of Directors, and staff in CCNL in their day to day struggles to finalize the appeal in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
(3.4) We have the understanding that Patentees have invested for years in the Patented invention of CCNL without any return on their investment, but Patentees should as well appreciate the Management of CCNL for all the efforts put in place to finalize the case in the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
(4.0) Conclusion
(4.1) It is the sole responsibility of the Supreme Court of Nigeria to fix hearing date for cases listed before it as demonstrated by Honourable justices Uwa in the case between Bajoga v. Government, F.R.N.2007, when he said and I quote him verbatim.
It is the court`s duty to fix hearing date of the motion on notice after granting leave. An applicant has no role to play in the fixture of such hearing dates.
Per: Justice Uwa
Bajoga v. Government, F.R.N.2007
(4.2) From the above authority of Justice Uwa, it is obvious that the fixing of hearing date for cases before a court of competent jurisdiction is not the duty of any litigant but the responsibility of the court.
(4.3) Asking me (Yusuf Nurudeen) or The Board Of Directors in CCNL to fix hearing date for a case before The Supreme Court of Nigeria is like asking us to take over the responsibility of the court.
(4.4) As the court pleases, & on the discretion of the court, the court shall notify The Board Of Directors in CCNL the next or new hearing date of suit sc./69/2011 through an instrument of the court called HEARING NOTICE.
(4.5) The moment a new hearing notice is issued by the court, I shall notify all the CCNL Patentees on the social media.
(4.5) Thanks for your understanding.
Yusuf Nurudeen (AAT, ACA)
CCNL Marketing Manager
4, Ogudu Road,
Ojota,
Lagos.
+234-703-252-2248
CCNL Twitter Handle:
www.twitter.com/Comandlem_NigFacebook group:
www.facebook.com/groups/comandclemforum/Instagram:
www.instagram.com/comandclem_nig_ltd